Technology keeps changing. The difficult part rarely does.

Thinking about systems, judgment, people. And the greatest question: what we must not delegate as we enter AI age?

Next?

AI should be used, not surrendered to.

Complexity deserves nuance. Decisions require clarity.

The technology may be unprecedented. Many of the questions are not.

Information is abundant. Too much. Judgment is not. Never enough.

Next?

The work between the work.

In difficult projects, I have often found myself connecting the pieces that were not supposed to be disconnected in the first place: technology and business, decisions and consequences, formal roles and real responsibility.

I call that dark matter. It is invisible until the system starts to pull apart.

Some notes worth leaving unfinished.

Not content. A place to follow a line of thought long enough to see where it goes.

Follow the thinking

And then I tried to build it.

I am building a running application almost entirely with AI coding agents. The implementation is often theirs. The concept, constraints, priorities and decisions remain mine.

The runner remains at the centre.A future interactive study

Heart-rate intensity shifts from pink towards red. During a long pause, the runner collapses; during a short one, they jog in place. It is playful — but it is also a reminder that a body is not a spreadsheet.

Signal over noise. Flexible plans over false perfection. Assistance without surrender.

See the experiment

I am interested in what holds — and what slips through.

Technology is only one way I pay attention. The rest comes from running, history, philosophy, food, literature, conversation, and a fondness for metaphors that sometimes arrive before the explanation.

Really about me

If something here resonated, we probably have something to talk about.

Email — details to follow

LinkedIn — details to follow

The technology may be unprecedented. Many of the questions are not.